Sunday
May 10, 2009 |
Remember that this and other columns are available
in PDF)
**********
A few weeks ago – April 10, to be
exact – I wrote on this page that the then forthcoming electoral debacle
in Ekiti State foretold the sham that will take the place of the general
elections of 2011. In the opening paragraph of a column titled “Ekiti as
a preview of 2011,” I warned: “Those who persist in seeing Umaru Musa
Yar'Adua as a democrat at heart had better pay attention to the macabre
show the man took to Ekiti State.” Yar’Adua, I continued, “comes across
as a man who wants power at all cost and for its own sake.”
I wrote those words in the context of Yar’Adua’s bizarre campaign stump
in the hotly contested state. First, the resident of Aso Rock
manufactured alleged achievements for Mr. Segun Oni, the party’s
governorship candidate and impostor who was justly removed by an
appellate court. Then he stood by, a confounded and tragic figure, as
Speaker Dimeji Bankole tried to galvanize a smattering of party faithful
with a fully treasonous campaign speech.
Dimeji told his audience that the PDP had pocketed Ekiti in the
elections of April 2007 with the use of police power. A speaker who
habitually misspeaks, Bankole then reminded his listeners that their
(ruling) party boasts the “commander-in-chief” of the Nigerian Armed
Forces. Not one to settle for a coded message, Bankole was not shy to
spell out what he meant. This time around, he assured, the party would
deploy the intimidating force of the military to capture Ekiti.
A president worthy of the name would have recognized the grave danger of
Bankole’s perverse speech. He would have immediately stepped forward,
asked for the microphone, and publicly rebuked the speaker for telling
the world that the PDP’s idea of an election was to stage a coup d’etat
against the wishes of the electorate. Yar’Adua glumly listened to
statements that amounted to a threat to subvert democratic ideals.
If Bankole’s martial rhetoric was disturbing, things got even more
ludicrous before the April 25 date of the rerun polls. Next and a few
Nigerian websites posted the taped voice of Governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola
of Osun State doing his treasonous best to rally PDP partisans. Oyinlola,
a former military officer, is heard rehearsing an armed strategy to
intimidate and suppress opposition sympathizers. He pledges to equip PDP
operatives with military uniforms and weapons to enable them to
“capture” Ekiti.
|
In a country where the rule of
law is more than a cynical fad, Oyinlola’s taped plan to
sabotage democracy would have elicited universal condemnation.
The man would have been flushed out of his gubernatorial seat
and led away in handcuffs, a disgraced figure. |
The
former president blithely retorted that he wasn’t aware that any
polling reforms were in the offing. |
|
Not in Yar’Adua’s Nigeria. Oyinlola
remains in the office he has tainted by his odoriferous speech, among
other unbecoming acts.
It’s painful to gloat that one’s dire prediction about Ekiti and 2011 is
being vindicated. Yet, when a character like former President Olusegun
Obasanjo takes to mocking the man he imposed as Nigeria’s
sleeper-in-chief, Nigerians had better take notice. It’s a sign that
things are truly bleak.
Reporters recently asked Obasanjo to weigh in on Umaru Yar’Adua’s avowed
reform of Nigeria’s electoral laws. The former president blithely
retorted that he wasn’t aware that any polling reforms were in the
offing.
In its terseness and wicked indirection, the response was typical
Obasanjo. Of course, the former president is smarting from a sharp
decline in his fortunes within the ruling party. At a recent gathering
in Abuja that it styled a convention, the ruling party pretty much
whittled down Obasanjo’s powers.
It was only three years ago that the PDP tagged Obasanjo “father of
modern Nigeria.” The same party seems on a mission to deflate the
expired emperor’s ego. Its convention stripped Obasanjo of his dream to
hold a monopoly on the chairmanship of the party’s board of trustees
unto death.
Increasingly vilified, even ostracized, by many of the men and women he
smuggled into power at various levels, Obasanjo’s legendary
vindictiveness appears aroused. His revenge? To tell the truth – at
least on occasion – about the bunch he hoisted into illegitimate power.
Some tell the truth as a way to set themselves, and others, free. Not
Obasanjo. For him, it seems, the motivation for speaking truth is merely
to get even. However untoward his motivation, what matters is that we
now have Obasanjo’s confession that Yar’Adua’s vaunted electoral reform
is a yarn, another jiggery pokery.
Nobody who’s watched the sordid events in Ekiti can retain confidence in
Yar’Adua, the PDP or the national electoral commission to husband
democratic ideals. Even as the drama in Ekiti fostered fears of a
military putsch, the PDP hunkered down, determined to snatch the state
by unfair and foul means. Maurice Iwu, a man with neither an ounce of
integrity nor sense of shame, worked feverishly behind the scenes to
gratify the ruling party’s plot. What was this “independent electoral
umpire” doing at a meeting that featured such PDP stalwarts as Yar’Adua,
Bankole Dimeji and David Mark, but with not a single participant from
the opposing AC?
Ekiti was Yar’Adua’s opportunity to silence skeptics by demonstrating
his seriousness about ethical and electoral reforms. Alas, the man (and
his party as well as INEC) chose to reveal the fake product they’ve been
marketing as electoral reforms.