Wednesday
June 3, 2009 |
Remember that this and other columns are available
in PDF)
**********
Anybody who wished to gauge what
Nigerians think about their country’s bizarre brand of “democracy”
should have been in London on May 29.
I was there as one of the speakers in a symposium tagged “The State of
the Nigerian Nation.” It was clear to me that Nigerians had exhausted
their patience with the coterie of criminals who have hijacked their
nation, and that something is about to give.
Headlined by Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka, the event was organized by the
Nigerian Liberty Forum. The NLF, whose public face is Kayode Ogundamisi,
exemplifies what can be achieved when committed, mostly young, citizens
come together to exclaim no to the diabolical bunch who’re mortgaging
their country’s interests.
Given many Nigerians’ tendency to quickly discount the perfidious acts
of their so-called leaders, it’s comforting to behold a group that’s
sworn not to forget. Instead, the NLF maintains a formidable sense of
the multiple ways in which Nigeria has been betrayed. The group’s goals
include advocacy of “good governance, accountability and the
enthronement of democracy” and the organization of “peaceful public
protests against corrupt Nigerian practices.”
It has recorded some remarkable feats. When Umaru Yar’Adua visited the
United Kingdom, the NLF mobilized Nigerians to come out and remind the
man’s British hosts about his tainted mandate.
More recently, the group pulled off a successful rally that sent former
President Olusegun Obasanjo cowering for cover. Obasanjo had been
invited by the London School of Economics to talk about his role as a
United Nations’ peace envoy to the Congo. The NLF felt that, given
Obasanjo’s record as president, his name and peace should never be
mentioned in the same breath.
True, the NLF fell short of persuading LSE to withdraw its invitation.
Even so, its members ensured that Obasanjo’s inflated and delusional
credential as a peacemaker was eloquently called into question.
In a sense, the symposium was proof that the NLF is far from just
reactive. Its lineup of speakers was morally august. There was the
former Chair of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Nuhu Ribadu.
Soft-spoken in voice and wiry in appearance, Ribadu’s message resonated
deeply with the audience. In what amounted to a cry from the heart, he
implored Nigerians, one, to reject the false creeds those in power
employ to divide and conquer and, two, to reclaim their country from the
hands of its despoilers.
There was Femi Falana, one of Nigeria’s most intrepid lawyers, whose
insider account of the recent electoral shame in Ekiti reminded the
audience about the depth of the ruling party’s determination to
emasculate the Nigerian electorate.
The unprepossessing Sowore Omoyele, publisher of saharareporters.com,
proved a crowd favorite. Omoyele’s website, which combines hard-edged
investigative reports with an iconoclastic style, has endeared him to
many Nigerians who relish the way he exposes the cupid underbelly of the
ruling class. He challenged Nigeria’s traditional media to awaken to the
need to identify with the cause of the masses or risk losing relevance.
Josephine Amuwo, who helps run a highly successful London-based agency
that offers training and a variety of other services to women, gave a
short but spirited testimony about her passion for Nigeria and her
belief in its capacity to rise from the morass and achieve its promise.
Affiong L. Affiong, a former student activist, spoke movingly about the
role of women in the struggle to liberate Nigeria.
The ever-ebullient Kennedy Emetulu and the energetic Professor Sola
Adeyeye gave rousing performances as moderators of the morning and
afternoon sessions respectively.
So much was at stake at the London symposium. That it was held on May
29, a day Obasanjo presumptuously declared “Democracy Day,” was at once
fortuitous and added to the dramatic temperature.
Soyinka’s speech skewered the notion that May 29, rather than June 12
(when Nigerians held what’s acknowledged as the finest election in their
country’s history), merits designation as the day democratic aspirations
are to be celebrated.
There was, besides, a running subplot to the symposium that lent it some
air of drama. Prior to my arrival in London, I’d received feelers that
the Yar’Adua regime was hostile to this gathering of Nigerians to take
stock. In London, I was shocked to discover how chagrined Abuja was at
the prospect of this meeting. Under pressure from the Nigerian High
Commission in London, the London Metropolitan University pulled out as
co-sponsors of the event.
When Sowore, Ogundamisi and I sat down in the studios of BEN TV to do a
live interview on the conference, the audio became unaccountably mute. I
later learned that the High Commission had registered its displeasure
with the Nigerian owner of the studio for letting subversive elements
appear on his TV. At the symposium, a man told me that the commission
had signaled that any Nigerian groups that attended the event courted
sharp censure.
Despite these shameful efforts, the hall was packed from morning till
the event’s conclusion. Still, the government’s attempt to undermine the
symposium struck me as powerful proof that our democracy is yet deformed.
